Punjabi singer and actor Diljit Dosanjh has spoken publicly after reports emerged that his film Sutlej was removed from streaming in India.
During an Instagram Live session, Diljit said he was not surprised by the reported decision, revealing that he had always believed there was a possibility the film could be taken down after its release.
Responding to the controversy, Diljit told viewers that the development was "expected" and not something that caught him by surprise.
He explained that releasing the film without prior announcements had always been the best strategy, suggesting that it was the only practical way to ensure audiences had the chance to watch it before any possible action could be taken.
Diljit also revealed that he had already hinted to fans a day earlier to download the film if they were able to do so. He added that people should watch and share it while they still could, indicating that he had anticipated uncertainty over its availability.
Speaking about his feelings after the release, Diljit said that once the film had reached audiences, he felt completely "tension-free." According to him, the most important goal was for people to watch the film, regardless of what happened afterward.
Diljit also remarked that once something reaches the internet, it can never truly be erased, a comment that quickly gained attention on social media. Many viewers linked the remark to the film's controversial journey and its reported removal from the streaming platform.
According to Indian media reports, the Indian government has sought the removal of Sutlej from ZEE5, citing national security concerns. Released on 3 July 2026 after nearly three years of delays and multiple title changes, the film is reportedly inspired by Sikh human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra and focuses on alleged enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings and police excesses in Punjab during the 1980s and 1990s.
The reported move has reignited debate over the historical events portrayed in the film. While the Indian government has cited national security concerns, political analysts, human rights organisations and Sikh religious bodies quoted by Indian media have reportedly opposed the decision, saying the film highlights issues of historical and public importance.