Badla Brother torpedoes Ducky Bhai’s claim of innocence

Badla Brother has foiled Ducky Bhai’s bid to ‘salvage his reputation’ by distancing himself from Nadeem Naniwala’s harassment of roasters and announcing a refund amid the sham course controversy.

The controversy erupted when users who purchased courses on ‘Join Elite Group’ – a joint venture of Ducky, Naniwala and Rajab Butt - accused the platform of misleading them.

The platform promised ‘valuable’ lessons on social media live streaming, business startups, cryptocurrency, and e-commerce – all the stuff readily available for free online.

In a podcast with Talha, Ducky acknowledged the backlash and announced that he was completely withdrawing from the project or making it free.

He assured viewers that he had never intended to mislead them and that full refunds would be provided to those who had paid for the courses.

However, Badla said Ducky’s claims are a pack of lies. He said he was aware of Ducky’s planning to distance himself from his associates and he had already pointed out this strategy.

Ducky also outlined a refund process, requiring users to submit a screen recording of their transaction details for verification.

He shifted the blame to his associates, specifically Rajab Butt for rushing to launch the half-baked project.

He stated that while he was initially involved in promoting the platform, he had little control over its management and content delivery.

Badla said Ducky was habitual of shifting blame on others and alleged that he was the mastermind behind the ‘scam’.

As Ducky categorically refuted the fellows’ claims, Badla said Ducky should have broken his silence when he was forced to leave the country.

Badla Brother had left the country as Naniwala and Ducky allegedly harassed him over criticism of their content.

A few days ago, YouTuber Sham Idrees claimed that he was a victim of Ducky Bhai’s threats and bullying seven years ago.

The issue has reignited a broader conversation about influencer accountability in the digital space. It has also raised concerns about the ethics of monetizing knowledge that may not provide real value to audiences.