Fans question Afghan Captain’s decision not to bowl in crucial T20 World Cup thriller
Headline 1: Rashid Khan Faces Backlash After Afghanistan’s Double Super Over Defeat to South Africa
Afghanistan captain Rashid Khan has come under intense criticism from fans and commentators after his team’s dramatic double Super Over defeat to South Africa in a high-stakes ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 clash at the Narendra Modi Stadium on Wednesday.
In what has been described as one of the most thrilling encounters of the tournament so far, the match went into a rare double Super Over after the two sides remained tied.
Despite the extended decider, the contest was only settled on the final ball when Afghanistan batter Rahmanullah Gurbaz was dismissed, sealing victory for South Africa.
Rashid khan saved his reputation and didn't bowl in both super overs
— مدثر⚘️ (@Mudasserk3) February 11, 2026
While the match delivered full value to spectators in Ahmedabad, the aftermath has seen Rashid’s leadership come under scrutiny.
Critics have questioned why the star leg-spinner did not bowl himself during the decisive Super Over phases, particularly given his reputation as one of the world’s premier T20 bowlers.
Afghanistan failed to capitalize in the second Super Over, falling short of the 24-run target set by South Africa.
Rashid Khan is the biggest coward I've ever seen. He couldn't bring himself in a super over in a ground he's been bowling for years now. A 't20 legend' who's scared af to step up????
— ANU???? (@Anuphobia_007) February 11, 2026
The defeat triggered a wave of reaction on social media, where some users labeled the skipper’s decision-making as overly cautious and accused him of shying away from responsibility at a critical moment.
Analysts and fans alike have debated whether Rashid should have taken charge with the ball during such a pivotal stage, arguing that experienced leaders are expected to step forward under pressure.
Others, however, have pointed out that team strategies in Super Overs are often pre-planned and may not solely rest on the captain’s individual preference.