New York officials slam 'shocking' Supreme Court gun ruling
Stay tunned with 24 News HD Android App
The 6-3 ruling, which comes as the country grapples with a shocking surge in gun crime, overturns a New York state law that required a person to prove they had legitimate self-defense needs to receive a gun permit.
The ruling has repercussions across the United States, as it will prevent states from restricting people carrying guns.
New York's governor Kathy Hochul said the decision marked a "dark day" while Big Apple mayor Eric Adams said it "may have opened an additional river feeding the sea of gun violence."
"Shocking, absolutely shocking, that they have taken away our rights to have reasonable restrictions," Hochul told reporters, breaking off from making a separate announcement.
"We can have restrictions on speech -- you can't yell fire in a crowded theater but somehow there's no restrictions allowed on the Second Amendment," she said, referring to the constitutional amendment allowing Americans the right to bear arms.
Despite a growing call for limits on firearms after two mass shootings in May stunned the country, the court sided with advocates who said the US Constitution guarantees the right to own and carry guns.
Hochul, a Democrat, tweeted that the ruling was "outrageous," accusing the six judges of acting "recklessly."
"This decision may have opened an additional river feeding the sea of gun violence, but we will do everything we can to dam it.
"We will work together to mitigate the risks this decision will create once it is implemented, as we cannot allow New York to become the Wild West," the Democrat said in a statement.
Everything in our power
Hochul said the state would respond by "closely reviewing our options -- including calling a special session of the legislature."
New York's attorney general, Letitia James, also said she was reviewing decision.
The New York law said that to be given a permit to carry a firearm outside the home, a gun owner must clearly demonstrate that it is explicitly needed for self-defense -- meaning those without the demonstrated need could not do so.
Gun-rights advocates said that violated the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which says "the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
The ruling comes just over a month after an 18-year-old used an AR-15-type assault rifle to kill 10 African Americans at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York, and another gunman also aged 18 and using a similar rifle killed 21 people, the majority of them children, at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas.
Biden 'deeply disappointed' with court's guns ruling
President Joe Biden said Thursday he is "deeply disappointed" with a Supreme Court ruling that expands the right to carry firearms in public across the United States.
The Supreme Court's ruling that Americans have the right to carry guns in public is "shameful," the governor of California, the state with some of the most restrictive firearms laws, said Thursday.
"A dark day in America," Gavin Newsom wrote on Twitter.
"This is a dangerous decision from a court hell bent on pushing a radical ideological agenda and infringing on the rights of states to protect our citizens from being gunned down in our streets, schools, and churches. Shameful."
The 6-3 decision by a right-leaning court strikes down a century-old New York law that required a person to prove they had a legitimate self-defense need, or "proper cause," to receive a gun permit.
Several other states, including California, have similar laws -- and the court's ruling will curb their ability to restrict people from carrying guns in public.
The ruling comes just weeks after a man walked into a Texas elementary school and used a legally-acquired weapon to kill 19 children and two adults, in a crime that shocked America.